Display:


Re: Indiana by less than 1% (2.00 / 1)

Facts are facts.


by cherrygarcia on Fri May 09, 2008 at 02:50:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Indiana by less than 1% (none / 0)

Yes, and I included a lot of them in my last post.  You might consider reading it, and then for extra credit, thinking about how it benefits Obama's chances for November to continue quibbling about stupid issues like this.

Does it help Obama in any conceivable way to try and diminish the legitimacy of Hillary's win in Indiana?  Of course not.  But clearly they just can't help themselves.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri May 09, 2008 at 03:01:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

yours was conjecture (none / 0)

it is well known that Limbaugh was sowing the seeds of chaos intentionally.  Your points are mere conjecture.


She was against seating MI and FL before she was for it.
by lojasmo on Fri May 09, 2008 at 09:00:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Indiana by less than 1% (none / 0)

Exactly Steve "They just can't help themselves" and that very irrational position constantly thrown in Clinton supporters face is why they suck!! and most of us are sickened by how many "uhs" and demeanor of Obama!! Dkos people in every poll they held all the way up to Edwards leaving the race had him as their choice!! and Edwards won't even endorse their so called annointed one. So just let them continue to think they don't need us!!!


by stratdan1 on Fri May 09, 2008 at 09:56:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Indiana by less than 1% (none / 0)

Dems for a day - which wasn't sanctioned by the Obama campaign - involved getting voters who liked Obama to vote for him.

Operation Chaos involved getting people who hate Clinton to vote for her.

Big difference.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Fri May 09, 2008 at 08:16:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Indiana by less than 1% (none / 0)

"A year ago"?!  In May 2007, Obama was instructing Republicans and Independents to vote for him in the primaries but not the GE?  And they remembered his instructions eight months later, when the primaries started?


by deminva on Fri May 09, 2008 at 10:00:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Indiana by less than 1% (none / 0)

So now we're back to making shit up.


John McCain
by Mandoliniment on Fri May 09, 2008 at 10:43:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Indiana by less than 1% (none / 0)

If you're not making it up, then provide links to prove it.  We all know Obama has reached out to Independents and Republicans.  Apparently only you know that he actually made a cynical, public statement to the effect that he wanted Reps and Indys to vote for him in the primaries and didn't care if they don't support him in the General.  

And only you know about it because it didn't happen.  


by deminva on Fri May 09, 2008 at 11:18:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Indiana by less than 1% (none / 0)

Well, your "federal law" thing is a total fabrication; here in WI you can register at the polls on the day of the election.

The rest of your argument you've asserted several times without documentation, which is a classic hallmark of "making shit up."


John McCain
by Mandoliniment on Fri May 09, 2008 at 11:33:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Indiana by less than 1% (none / 0)

Wow.  Now folks are just making shit up.  


by deminva on Fri May 09, 2008 at 09:58:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]