Display:


Re: What she said was quite clear. (2.00 / 4)

No, I didn't mention his grandma, that's his business. I called him out for likening Ferraro to the Wright, something I believe that I can believe in hindsight most would agree was ludicrous.

I never blogged about the comment by Obama, and only did now to show how ridiculous it is, both of these are, with whats being claimed they mean.


by Jerome Armstrong on Thu May 08, 2008 at 11:15:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What she said was quite clear. (none / 0)

I stand corrected; I should have checked against my memory, and apologize.

I will say your reticence on that matter did not spread to many diarists...


Fight the Smears!
by Lettuce on Thu May 08, 2008 at 11:32:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What she said was quite clear. (none / 0)

Wow, an Obamabot apologized for his rantings. Amazing!


by doyenne49 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:14:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What she said was quite clear. (none / 0)

An Obamabot?


by cherrygarcia on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:22:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What she said was quite clear. (none / 0)

Defined as anyone who doesn't blindly stand by Hillary on this site.  


by crackerdog on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:28:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What she said was quite clear. (none / 0)

Sad.


by cherrygarcia on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:35:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What she said was quite clear. (1.00 / 2)

Defined as anyone who thinks the sun rises between Obama's asscheeks. Does that include you, pray?


by doyenne49 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:35:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What she said was quite clear. (none / 0)

You seem like a horrible person.  I hope I'm wrong.  Have a nice day.


by crackerdog on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:47:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What she said was quite clear. (none / 0)

As her comments get worse and worse with each post, I don't think you're wrong.


by Rationalisto on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:30:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What she said was quite clear. (none / 0)

It is always the other who is horrible. Look deep into a mirror, sir, deep and long.


by doyenne49 on Thu May 08, 2008 at 04:17:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What she said was quite clear. (none / 0)

Pathetic. How old are you again?


by cherrygarcia on Thu May 08, 2008 at 01:12:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What she said was quite clear. (none / 0)

well in your post above you compare obama's grandma comments with hillary's "working, hard-working Americans, white Americans" comments. It seems to me that the former was a (ham-fisted) go at inclusiveness and the latter either the outcome of being very tired indeed, or outright offensiveness. Or perhaps just a mere 'misspeak'.

It would be ridiculous not to talk about demographics and race, which is what you say some obama supporters want, but hillary appears to be equating 'white' with 'hard-working', and indeed with 'American'. Can't you see how and why people are antsy about this?


by ianrsuk on Thu May 08, 2008 at 11:32:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What she said was quite clear. (2.00 / 1)

inclusiveness totally wrong word, but what I mean is that he was making an attempt to talk about thorny racial issues more or less head-on. hillary was supposed to be talking about demographic and voting and made it sound like unsophisticated dog-whistling.


by ianrsuk on Thu May 08, 2008 at 11:44:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I'll mention his grandma (none / 0)

Obama said that she, being a "typical white person", felt afraid when she saw a black man on the street.  It's much less ambiguously insulting--and much less true--than what Clinton said.

It's now in the bulging Republican playbook.  We can discuus it further in September.


by Upstate Dem on Thu May 08, 2008 at 11:33:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Much less true? (2.00 / 1)

Gramma ratified the statement in his book.  It's true and not insulting.

Implying that non-whites are not "hardworking Americans" is both untrue and insulting.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Thu May 08, 2008 at 11:39:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

But he never did that. (none / 0)

Citing two examples of something does not mean that he's "equating" them except on a very basic level.

I will reiterate my example from those days:

When I was young, my cat Sarah would come and sit on my stomach when I lay on the floor to watch TV. Being an ill-tempered cat, she would painfully extend her claws into my flesh if I tried to move and disturb her warm seat.  She did this even though it damaged the person who fed and gave her a warm spot to sit on sometimes.

Likewise, Comrade Stalin, when pressed by the nazis, similarly scorched the earth behind his retreating forces, making it unusable for feeding his people or housing them for a generation.

Thus, by your logic, I am equating Stalin to my cat, yes?


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Thu May 08, 2008 at 11:37:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

least your cat never went for the jugular (none / 0)

siamese are insane.


His head is bowed. He thinks of men and kings. Yea, when the sick world cries, how can he sleep?
by RisingTide on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:19:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Gonna take your word on that one (none / 0)

Sarah was an alleycat originally.  Lived to be 20 years old, and became more and more Stalin-esque until the day she died.

Then she came back from the dead and lived for another few years.

Hmm, maybe she was more Rasputin than Stalin.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:46:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What she said was quite clear. (none / 0)

You may not have and I'm too lazy to check.  However, this site is yours and you didn't stop or speak out against those here that did.  


by crackerdog on Thu May 08, 2008 at 12:25:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]