Display:


The difference (2.00 / 2)

That money doesn't come out of our infrastructure budget, and Obama's been talking about a middle-class tax cut for the whole campaign.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue May 06, 2008 at 10:01:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The difference (2.00 / 2)

The money for Clinton's idea doesn't come out of the infrastructure money either! Look, fair is fair. If Obama is going to have the audacity to call Clinton's idea a gimmick, he should at least do the same for his own gimmick.
by zenful6219 on Tue May 06, 2008 at 10:05:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

It's that or nothing (2.00 / 2)

We both know that Bush will never sign a tax on the gas companies into law.  It's the infrastructure budget or nothing.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue May 06, 2008 at 10:07:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: It's that or nothing (2.00 / 2)

Ok, so the other argument is that Clinton shouldn't propose any ideas until after Bush is gone because he won't sign them into law? I guess Obama should have kept his mouth shut about his little $1,000 tax rebate. This is the same rebate he leads people to believe is going to happen before Bush leaves office.
by zenful6219 on Tue May 06, 2008 at 10:10:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

It could (2.00 / 2)

They approved one stimulus package, I don't see why they couldn't do a second.  I'm not a big fan of "I'm sorry we screwed up the economy" checks from the government, but they're feasable and more honest than this gas tax stuff, which supposes that Clinton can take on the oil lobbyists, OPEC price gouging, local gas station gouging, commodities trading law, an unreceptive congress, AND a president who will never sign it.

We have proof that a stimulus package will pass.  I guarantee you that Clinton's plan will never, ever pass muster before summer hits.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue May 06, 2008 at 10:22:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Like she's even going to try. (2.00 / 3)

And that's what makes it the worst kind of pandering.


by bookish on Tue May 06, 2008 at 10:25:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

It will be met with derision (2.00 / 1)

She hasn't made her case to her colleagues.  The very fact that she's making an issue of this is giving Republicans talking points for the fall... "Senator X voted against his own party's plan to lower your gas prices..."

Clinton seems to care nothing for the future of the pary.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue May 06, 2008 at 10:34:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Where is it? (none / 0)

And when is she going to the floor to fight for it?


by bookish on Tue May 06, 2008 at 10:35:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]