Display:


Re: Why Nominate Someone Who Has Less Than Half th (2.00 / 1)

Uhh, because we levied those punishments against Florida and Michigan, and Senator Clinton agreed that was the number until it suited her politically? And that every time Obama gets a chance to campaign in a state that favors Clinton, he brings her numbers down dramatically, sometimes forcing to a win? And that there were literally hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of people who would have voted, had they thought it would matter? And that Obama has more delegates than Senator Clinton, along with popular votes, etc?

Sorry... hope that doesn't get in the way of your "point".


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Mon May 12, 2008 at 12:30:04 AM EST

Wait a second... THE SNARK METER! (none / 0)

DAMN YOU!

YOU MANIAC!

YOU BLEW IT UP!

AH, DAMN YOU! GOD DAMN YOU ALL TO HELL!


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Mon May 12, 2008 at 12:32:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Wait a second... THE SNARK METER! (none / 0)

Ain't got no snark.  Please attempt to answer the question, instead of attempting to mislead other readers.


by Clarkin08 on Mon May 12, 2008 at 01:53:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why Nominate Someone Who Has Less Than Half th (none / 0)

Your reasons have nothing to do with winning the election in November.  I think you misunderstood the question.


by Clarkin08 on Mon May 12, 2008 at 01:51:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]