Display:


I believe I read this same diary (2.00 / 3)

a month ago.  Also, see the million accurate rebuttals of why "disenfranchisement" is the wrong word.

And yeah, we know about the credentials committee and eventual floor vote on seating MI and FL.  Thing is, the decision is only relevant if Clinton is behind in total delegates (NOT including MI and FL) when the vote gets to the floor.  Which means that for them to be seated, a number of Obama delegates would have to effectively vote to hand the nomination over to Clinton.  How likely do you think that is?

Unless, of course, the Clinton campaign has been planning a "mole" strategy of running supporters as Obama delegates.  Which I'm not too worried about, as it would require the kind of careful planning her campaign has not exhibited so far.


by corph on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 11:46:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes, you did. (2.00 / 2)

It's a cut-and-paste from a MyDD diary on 3/17.  And many of the statements in it are completely unsupported by the single document that is linked to.

It's as if using the <blockquote&rt; tag is enough to fool the overly credulous.


by McNasty on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 01:39:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]