Display:


I really want to TR bobswern (2.00 / 1)

for use of the term "Obamaniac".  Bob, cripes, that's so last month.  
We are ow trying to heal our divisions and behave nice with each other.  

"Disaffecting fellow Dems is counterproductive".

Get it Bob?


Sexism is real.
by grassrootsorganizer on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 07:20:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

"Obamamaniac" is THEIR term... (1.80 / 5)

... at my county convention, the Obama delegates had home-made t-shirts and signs with "Obamamaniac" all over them.

So -

- let me get this straight:

It's TRable to call the Obama supporters a name that, they themselves, have endorsed?

Really, you make my head spin.....


by MyOwnClone on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 10:24:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "Obamamaniac" is THEIR term... (none / 0)

Traditionally self-identification has always allowed wider margins of expression than labeling-the-other.

E.g., don't use the d--- word if you're not a lesbian yourself, or the n----- word if you're not black.


by Aris Katsaris on Wed Apr 23, 2008 at 06:47:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "Obamamaniac" is THEIR term... (none / 0)

Yeah well f___ that.

That's friggin Orwellian.


Until recently I was selling drugs, and now I'm selling Obama T-shirts.
by switching sides on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 02:53:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "Obamamaniac" is THEIR term... (none / 0)

No, politeness vs rudeness has nothing to do with Orwell. Everything to do with proper-vs-improper familiarity.

Someone can't be polite/rude/offensive to him/herself. Another person can however be polite/rude/offensive to them.

Therefore I can be offended by words you say to me, even though I would not be offended if I said the same things about myself.

Is this now plain enough for you to understand?

Really, the concept of improper familiarity is hardly a new one.


by Aris Katsaris on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 10:43:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]