You seem to have one meme, Wright which is fair (if you stick to facts and not just right wing talking points) but I think the Big O has answered those questions quite well and from recent polling seems to have bounced back quite well. While you still haven't even begun to answer how she overcomes her HUGE negatives. I don't think the electorate will dismiss them as easily as you do. Especially after it all comes out again and again. Do you honestly believe that people just need to learn more about her?
What a mess.
There is so much wrong with your analysis; where to start?
Obama's negatives, now that he is much better known than before, are as high as Hillary's. This is what happens when one enters a national contest.
Wright is all? Oh no, not at all. Much will be made of the fact that the Big O kept admitting that Rezko fundraised 22K, no 50K, no 125K, no....
Big O has answered questions well? Oh yeah? Now he's getting backed into one corner after another and is prevaricating.
Recent polling? Bounced back? Sure - among Democrats. The Rethugs aren't going to be as kind as the Democrats.
RW talking points? See above.
Facts? What election is about facts? Voters in the aggregate don't have a chance to know the facts, if they even care. Which is sad, of course, because if all the facts were known and people voted on them, Hillary would win in a landslide.
Hillary's negatives? Democrats love her and a lot of indies do, too.
Montague, as of today's Gallop poll, Democrats appear to love Obama about 8% more than they love Sen. Clinton, and I can assure you that Republicans hate Sen. Clinton a heck of a lot more and with significantly more bile, than Obama.
I can't understand all the rest of your post through all the spittle and bile.
