Why is this the candidates' issue?
Neither Hillary nor Barack caused this. Their getting involved is just weird to me.
Sure, it can appear "noble" (bbbuuttt, the VOTERS! - They have to have a VOICE!)
The reality is that this is a consequence for an action that is far beyond the candidates. Either way is fine - revote or not, but why would Clinton and Obama need to weigh in on this? It's not really their doing nor theirs to undo.
I've never heard of an election where candidates manage the affair. Some would call that a conflict of inteerest! Imagine that.
But at this point what's another disingenuity? The rules were agreed upon long before re-writing them became politically expiedient. So go ahead. Who believes in icebergs? Engines: Full Ahead.
having the candidates shoot free throws. ;)
