I realize sarcasm is pretty much the only arrow in your rhetorical quiver, but I'm afraid sarcasm will not explain why a candidate who has the primary wrapped up would continue to engage in divisive personal attacks against the candidate whose supporters he will need in November.
Have a nice day, Bob. I'm sure you have many other Clinton supporters to go taunt in the name of unity.
Facing facts is not "taunting," Steve.
Have a nice day.
sooner rather than later. if this is so, they'd want to keep close to her in PA (she'll probably win) and keep close or win by large enough margins in other states in the hope that the math will be even more impossible to ignore. if the perception continues that she's still in this, she will be less likely to drop out of the race and this will go all the way to Denver, which could be bad for the party.
No candidate is going to unilaterally disarm.
Could you please itemize the daily personal attacks that you claim HRC has endured?
According to HRC campaign Spokesman Phil Singer- Obama's asking for an an apology to the American people for suggesting that she hadn't been involved in passing NAFTA when her schedules provide "direct, incontrovertible evidence that Senator Clinton was involved on this issue" was a "personal attack."
Asking for her to release her tax returns is a personal attack akin to Ken Starr.
It seems like challenging her with anything that is difficult to respond to is a personal attack. Obama is a real Monster with all the personal attacks he is levying</snark>
Asking her to release her tax returns is a personal attack?
Please explain this faulty line of reasoning.
I was just echoing her campaign saying it was like Starr... notice the closing snark tag...
