This has been overlooked generally. I looked on my own and found that most state convention which will acutally pledge the caucus delegates will be a little after the primary calendar finishes the first week of June. However, since we know who the conventions are going to vote for in advance, the only way that gets turned around is if there's some major power play (which would come from Clinton's side given Obama's caucus dominance) or if the superdelegates magically broke uniformly to one candidate or the other.
CNN has been fairly accurate up to this point and is a generally trusted news source on this blog so my original comment stands.
Clinton "won" california but only got a handful of delegates more than Obama but Barack Obama is consistently winning states, so far he has won 30 out of the last 44 and like yesterday by very, very significant margins.
Iowa was a blowout victory against Clinton. And the story keeps repeating. But Clinton, to date. Has only been able to firewall the challenge of Obama . New Hampshire was a firewall. Ohio. And they said up and down that Texas was going to be a firewall.
How is it that you can pretend that Clinton won Texas, when she came out with less delegates ?
Bottom line: Clinton is losing the race.
Iowa was not a blowout - It was a caucus - BHO got 37% of the caucus that means 63% voted against him. Except for VT,WI,CO and Maine all the rest of the places that BHO won have a majority of AA votes. And then there is the undemocratic caucus factors
