"Not even valid."
That's also what Edwards'supporters used to say whenever his Senate record was brought up.
And look where he's at now.
Funny how it was perfectly fine for Hillary to support Obama when he was running for US Senate, but now she's the anti-Christ. More Obaman situational ethics.
I wouldn't know about that since I preferred Nancy Skinner over Obama and have frequently criticized him on a variety of topics (even got voted off of KOS for it last year.)
But this entry is about the Clintons, so that's who I was talking about on it.
I have to admit I am kinda touchy about this generational BS that's becoming more and more popular. I have (rather unhappily) now reached the age where I too am considered obsolete. :)
Since they've been in the Senate together I see little difference in the records of Hillary and Obama. And the differences in their current promises amount to hair-splitting. But I must admit that having either a Bush or a Clinton in the WH for the past 20 years has made me sick of both royal dynasties.
20 years of Clinton-Bush, followed by 8 more of Hillary, and then 8 more of Jeb, followed possibly by 8 of Chelsea, is a rather nauseating prospect.
I say kill the beast right now while we can.
You really might want to wait until Rezko's trial starts before you pledge the store to Obama, if you are a democrat.
Out of curiosity, if Obama does receive the nomination, and Fitzgerald shows Obama to more criminally involved with Rezko than we know now, what is your contingency plan?
McCain is old?
Do you know?
i tried to bring up how both of hillary's brothers had recieved hundreds of thousands of dollars for asking for clemency for various criminals (which was granted)
but these dipshits claim that it's "too old" and "old news"
bullshit.
the 527 ads will be pouring out the moment she gets the nom, and what's she gonna say? i didn't know my brothers were getting paids thousand of dollars to ask me to give felons clemency?