And the problem for you- is that no matter how many times you repeat this- the reality is that these are present narratives, and not narratives based on 14 years of consistent polling showing a candidate with consistently bad favorable ratings. In other words, they have room to improve, but HRC does not. Her numbers are what they are. You know it. I suspect the campaign knows it. So what's left is pretending like they don't matter or mudding the waters as if Obama or Edwards face anywhere near the level of hardcore unfavorables that Clinton has. I repeat what I said to you another diary. they have the ability to change their narrative. Clinton does not. It's not simply a matter of regurgitating the numbers of the moment. It's a matter of what this diarist did- putting those numbers into meaningful context. What I guess you and her campaign are hoping is that no real understanding of context ever develops amongst the electorate. It's not a bad strategy, but that's what you have to hope for or else she's got so serious problems.