Display:


The idiot deserved to be fired (2.20 / 5)

We face a moment in our history in which our liberties are in danger, and big brother, represented by George W. Bush and his cronies, want to trample our rights. This message is watered down if some idiot implies that Hillary Clinton is somehow the type of politicians who would apply illegal surveillance without suspicion to Americans.
This baseless, pointless ad divides the Democratic Party, and undermines Clinton's chances if she eventually wins the nomination.

by kingsbridge77 on Wed Mar 21, 2007 at 11:39:31 PM EST

Re: The idiot deserved to be fired (none / 0)

Are you ignorant? YOu are calling someone an idiot while you expose your own ignorance. The original ad had IBM like corporation as its target. It was about thinking outside the box and not do things the establishment way like sheep. It was not about civil liberties.

Hillary's conversation comment was also kind of ironic considering Hillary is very careful at monitoring how the conversation should flow. Kind of Orwellian way of making us believe she wants a real conversation. She can't even admit she saw the ad.

Also the ad was obviously tongue in cheek like the original Apple ad. But you would know this if you actually read comments in other diaries instead of rehashing the same shitty whining which we have debunked several times before.


by Pravin on Thu Mar 22, 2007 at 12:27:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The idiot deserved to be fired (3.00 / 1)

I don't think the man is an "idiot" but I pretty much agree with the rest of this post.  

He can say that the spot is about Obama representing "a new kind of politics" all he wants.  But 1984 references actually MEAN SOMETHING.  I remember watching this ad back in college (the original apple ad), and thinking it was amazing.  As an apple user it made me proud. "We'll show that big bad IBM!"

However, since then the Bush administration has taken power and now we have warrentless wire-tapping, Guantanamo,the suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus, and a media outlet (Fox) that spreads the DIRECT mesage of a corrupt administration.  

I'm sorry, but things have changed, and 1984 is much closer to fact than fiction than when apple used it in its commercial.  I find it ironic and sad that the use of this reference to attack Hillary Clinton got such play on the Fox "News" channel.

We are getting ready for the fight of our lives in '08, and frankly I am in no mood to see Hillary Clinton's face smashed with a hammer when the face should be that of Bill O'reily (or whatever right-winger you choose).  

The funny thing about this ad is it gave me reason to reconsider my stance on Hillary Clinton. I had all but decided to back either Edwards or possibly Obama.  But seeing how much joy the right has gotten out of seeing Hillary bashed makes me realize what a shit-sandwich her presidency would represent to the right. Perhaps even though she isn't as progressive as I'd like, her election would be an important step in this country's abandonment of radical right-wing politics.


by Aaron007 on Thu Mar 22, 2007 at 01:48:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The idiot deserved to be fired (none / 0)

I remember that ad too and cheered on Apple in the 80s. But I never for once thought IBM was run by evil execs. I did think IBM and other PC makers were these entrenched interests the same way some of us think about Hillary. If someone has a sense of that original ad, you would be thinking of Hillary's place among the old boys network and how she represents the old way of doing things, and how her references to "let's have a conversation" are kind of Orwellian. Her conversation is one way.

I highly doubt the admaker felt Hillary was as bad as Bush and Co.


by Pravin on Thu Mar 22, 2007 at 10:14:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Phil's an idiot. (none / 0)

Agree with first post, that Phil is an idiot.

1. It should have been obvious to him that if he was caught, Obama's campaign could be seriously undermined.

  1. Running the ad undermines Clinton's campaign, should she win the primary.
  2. Prevents Obama and Clinton from becoming each other's running mate.
  3. The apple ad is extremely powerful, Orwellean.
  4. Republicans do not have enough brain to understand the ad, or why it says 1984 and not 1985.
Does nothing to draw any republican voters over to progressive side.


by saguaro on Thu Mar 22, 2007 at 02:43:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Phil's an idiot. (none / 0)

I don' think this ad does any of that.  It keeps them from being running mates?!?!?!??!  FIrst of all, I don't think that any of these individuals running for president currently care about that and second of all, this was made from the outside, not the inside, and thus does prevent the candidates from doing anything!!!


Mark
by Mark J. Bowers on Thu Mar 22, 2007 at 06:57:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Whatever (none / 0)

If this ad came out in Jan 2008, then maybe it would make a difference.  All posting it this early does is defuse the ability of anyone to use it when it matters.

That said, I speak from complete ignorance as I haven't seen it yet and never thought the original was anything special.


by skintigh on Thu Mar 22, 2007 at 02:12:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Original not special? (none / 0)

The original is widely considered the best commercial ever produced. An advertising industry benchmark of originality and creativity. It  launched the Apple Macintosh personal computer, which is fairly meaningful in itself. Fwiw, you could look it up.


by candace in sonoma on Sun Mar 25, 2007 at 06:32:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The idiot deserved to be fired (none / 0)

The RW slant of the ad bothered me, too.


by LancDem on Thu Mar 22, 2007 at 04:37:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]