Not only that but filibuster would require 60 votes to maintain. I'm not sure we would get the 60. So a hold makes more sense.
41 not 60.
Right. I'm still only my second cup of coffee this morning and lately 60 has been branded into my brain. But even 41 is very doubtful so a hold would still have a better chance of accomplishing the task.
Correction, a filibuster takes 40 votes (well, actually 41), as I'm sure you meant to say. It takes 60 votes to overcome a filibuster.
Yep. Thanks.
