Display:


Roberts is a conservative hack (none / 0)

Unfortunately, Roberts is probably still more qualified and deserving of a Supreme Court appointment than Clarence Thomas. The problem isn't Roberts, it's how low the Dems have allowed the bar to sink in the last twenty years.

Roberts is probably as qualified as Thomas and less conservative. Maybe he's even less qualified than Thomas.

by Gary Boatwright on Wed Jul 20, 2005 at 01:35:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Roberts is a conservative hack (none / 0)

The response has been as I expected. I tried to push a petition tonight that basically said that Senator Specter should seek to determine if Judge Roberts will act as a moderate or a consertative judicial activist. The response I am seeing however is wait and see. I am not exactly certain what we are waiint to see? Shouldn't we start the process for those of us online now to shape how the eventual debate will occur in a month and half from now? Needless to say- the response has been tepid. It could be wording which I will work on and maybe resubmit a few days from now. But otherwise, I think it is a general talk a lot, but do very little approach to these issues by most of the rank and file. Maybe I am wrong- and I hope that I am. that there is a petition by some larger organization seeking to talk directly to the senators, but so far the response has really bothered me.
by bruh21 on Wed Jul 20, 2005 at 01:44:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Lowered Standards (none / 0)

The only thing Thomas was qualified for was getting confirmed by weasles like Biden. He was grossly incompetent, and a perjurer to boot, even if he hadn't been a serial sexual harasser, which definitely isn't compatible with a judicial temperament.
by Paul Rosenberg on Wed Jul 20, 2005 at 02:00:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lowered Standards (none / 0)

I think you are confusing this blog with Free Republic, and what you would do. Lucky for you that I am not in charge.
by bruh21 on Wed Jul 20, 2005 at 03:16:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lowered Standards (none / 0)

I think you must be a little unclear on the difference between "wanted" and "unwanted" as in "unwanted sexual advances."

But, then, we already knew that from your handle, didn't we?

by Paul Rosenberg on Wed Jul 20, 2005 at 03:23:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]