Display:


Re: Don't expect impeachment, unless... (none / 0)

Impeachment is not the solution. Winning elections is the solution.

Impeachment is a blunt axe that has been used twice in this country's history and in both cases in blatantly partisan fashion. Any Constitutional remedy that only works if the opposition party controls both house of Congress is no remedy at all. And resort to it in 2007 will only result in a huge backlash from a group of GOP partisans that are guaranteed to be plenty angry to start with.

If Democrats win control of Congress they need to concentrate first and foremost on removing the policy distortions that this administration has inserted into the economic and policy arenas, when it comes down to it Bush can't spend money he doesn't have.

We don't want Bush to go out with a Bang, we want him to go out with a Whimper. Impeachment would just bestow a Martyr tag on Bush for generations of Republicans to come, having him pack his bags in January 2009 with nothing but chaos to his credit is the fitting punishment.

What Bush fears more than anything else is for history to remember him as we do: "Worst President Ever". Let it Be So.

PollKatz: Bush Approval in 15 polls
by Bruce Webb on Sat Dec 24, 2005 at 01:40:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Don't expect impeachment, unless... (none / 0)

Minor historical note: the Republicans who controlled Congress during the Andrew Johnson impeachment were putatively in the same party as the president.  Johnson joined Lincoln on a "Union" ticket in 1864, but they were the Republican nominees nonetheless.  The Democratic Party to which Johnson once belonged vanished in 1861, at the moment Confederate troops fired on Ft. Sumter.  For all practical purposes, Johnson, like the majority in Congress, was a Republican.
by wallyw on Sat Dec 24, 2005 at 01:52:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Which obviates my point how? (none / 0)

The Republicans in control of Congress in 1868 clearly did not regard Johnson as one of them whatever label he had in the election of 1864

"The charges against President Johnson stemmed from the Tenure of Office Act of 1867. This law, which the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional in 1926, required the president to get the Senate's permission to remove any officeholder whose appointment it had to confirm.

Johnson was so angered by this challenge to the power of the president that he tested the law by suspending Secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton, the only Radical sympathizer in his cabinet, and replacing him with Ulysses S. Grant.

Eleven articles of impeachment were brought, charging Johnson with unlawfully removing Stanton and violating the Reconstruction Acts. The House of Representatives passed a resolution impeaching Johnson by a vote of 126 to 47."

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/impeachment/timeline/johnson.html

"For all practical purposes" Congress treated Johnson like a foreign occupier of the White House, even denying him the powers to appoint his own cabinet members.

As for the suggestion that the Democratic Party vanished in 1861 I would suggest that the organizers of the Jefferson/Jackson dinners would be profoundly surprised at knowing the Party mysteriously vanished.

Johnson was on the ticket as an attempt at ticket balancing, Republicans neither wanted nor expected him to become President. And the whole affair was partisan to the core.

PollKatz: Bush Approval in 15 polls
by Bruce Webb on Sun Dec 25, 2005 at 12:52:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]