Display:


Re: Clark or even better.... (none / 0)

Just the same way Edwards brought North Carolina, MO, West Virginia, etc.  It is a flawed arguement and I LIKE both of those guys.  If you cna provide some polls of those states, that is another story.  But there is nothing out there that proves this will happen.  Stop arguing that we should pick a candidate based on what state they are from.  It is not a valid arguement in picking a candidate and there is no way to make a rational arguement that Clark and Warner brings NM, FL, IA, WV and even VA, OH, or LA over to our side without knowing who the GOP candidate is.  This is why we need to fight for every state possible... location should have nothing to do with choice.  Background and political ideas are what we should focus on.  
http://www.imvotingrepublican.com/ McCain Sucks!
by yitbos96bb on Fri Nov 04, 2005 at 03:10:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Clark or even better.... (none / 0)

Look at past presidential elections

NC voted Republican since 1988
AR voted Clinton in 1992 and 1996. Gore narrowly lost AR in 2000. AR,FL,and VA are the only three Southern States Kerry(D) a Northeastern Liberal did well in.

IA and NM voted Democratic during the last 3 or 4 out of 5 Presidential elections.

by CMBurns on Fri Nov 04, 2005 at 09:32:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Clark or even better.... (none / 0)

Yes and the president's party always loses seats in mid term election... oh wait, we got our asses handed to us in 2002.

Clinton winning Arkansas means nothing.  It was his home state.  Edwards and Bayh are the only candidates I question whether can win their home state.  It is definately the only way they are in play.  Warner wins Virginia, and at this point would beat Allen in Virginia.  Clark probably wins Arkansas, although if he faces Huckabee, then he may very well lose.  

But that STILL doesn't mean that a centrist pulls the state.  Kerry did better in AR, FL and VA, but I don't exactly call his performance good in those states.  If you feel that Allen is going to be the GOP nominee, why don't you think he would do well in the south when in the last two elections a conservative Republican has won all the southern states and most of them in 1996.  Your argument works both ways.  

But you brought up that NC hadn't voted Democrat since 1988.  Lets look at the southern states since 1968 (The last 10 Elections)...

Florida - 1976, 1996
Georgia - 1976, 1980, 1992
Alabama - 1976
Louisiana - 1976, 1992, 1996
Mississippi - 1976
Texas - 1968, 1976
North Carolina - 1976
South Carolina - 1976
Tennessee - 1976, 1992, 1996
Arkansas - 1976, 1992, 1996
Virginia -

So in the last two elections, no southern state has gone Democrat, although some have been very close.  The most any state has voted Democratic in the last 10 elections is 3.  Virginia didn't vote for a democrat in that entire time.  In fact the times when a majority went Democratic, yes the candidate was southern, but he also faced an EXTREMELY unpopular incumbent president.  In the last 10 cycles, no southern state has officially gone for a Dem (Florida being the disputed exception) except if the Dem was both southern and either an incumbent or facing an extremely unpopular incumbent president, with the exception of Texas and Nixon.  In fact, my bet is that Clinton would have been the only incumbent to win a southern state had Carter not been from Georgia.  

So do I think the south is a lost cause?  Hell no.  I agree with Dean that the Dems need to go after the red neck vote as well as the liberal elite vote and the moderate vote.  All I am showing is that winning any southern state will take work and is not a given based on geography... with the exception of the home state although even then that isn't guarenteed... although Gore had been out of Tennessee for 8 years.  In other words pick a guy based on his policies, not on what state he is from.

http://www.imvotingrepublican.com/ McCain Sucks!
by yitbos96bb on Fri Nov 04, 2005 at 10:41:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Clark or even better.... (none / 0)

Prior to 1984, The Democratic Party was popular in the South. Jimmy Carter's - social moderate views are popular in Southern States during the 1976 Presidential elections.
Nowaday's Southern States have a tough time voting Democratic. Unless Democrats nominate a Southerner.
by CMBurns on Sat Nov 05, 2005 at 09:45:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Clark or even better.... (none / 0)

You guys can overanalyze this all you want but if Dems want to see any parts of the White House, then you better nominate a Southern GOvernor.

CLinton and Carter.
And understand why Carter really won.

Richard Nixon.

If the Dems want to win in 08, then they better run the 1976 election again.

  1. Make sure that everyone remembers the faults and dishonesty of the guy in office.
  2. People trust Southerners. Period.
  3. Run a strong Southern Governor who is strong on moral principles who people can feel warm and comfy in.

Hey, come to think about it, that's how we won in 1992. Oh wait, we can thank Perot for that.
Somebody pay McCain to run as a independent..
by Bruticus on Mon Nov 07, 2005 at 01:26:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]