Display:


Re: Clark-???? Ticket. (none / 0)

How am I mean spirited and negative?  I never said Clark Couldn't win.  All I bring up is the point that it is STUPID to pick a candidate based on geography and STUPID to assume you know how the EVs will pan out 3 years before the election without a shred of proof.  It is called being practical.  I like Clark, I like Warner, I like Feingold.  I think all three have a show of winning.  I think all three could get over 300 EVs.  But to assume they are an automatic lock and try to pass off your opinions on how they might do as pure fact is irresponsible.  

Allen is the favorite of the insiders.  He has not done well in polls so far.  Of course we are 3 years out and at this point, we had no idea Dean was going to explode into the front runner or that Kerry would win the nomination.  Bush was assumed in 2000, but only because the GOP had solidly fallen into line behind him.  Even Dole wasn't the assumed guy back in 1993.  

If you want to make a claim, back it up with facts... even polls lend some validity.  Otherwise preface it as I THINK THIS WILL HAPPEN.

http://www.imvotingrepublican.com/ McCain Sucks!
by yitbos96bb on Fri Nov 04, 2005 at 09:38:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]