Display:


Re: Clark or even better.... (none / 0)

If Bush had been from California, he would still have won the south.  Geography is a factor, but not an extremely important one.  TO pick a candidate and have that be one of the top factors is ridiculous... especially since being from a certain area does not mean you will score a victory.  Gore lost Tennessee and didn't get a southern state.  Edwards was on the ticket and didn't manage to bring a single southern state.  Even Clinton only pulled a few of them.  If you respect Warner's policies, then support him.  If you respect Clark's policies, then support him.  But if the main reaon you like either of them is one is from Virginia and the other is from Arkansas, you are following the same archaic thinking of most electable that FAILED miserably against a vulnerable president in 2004.  You are operating under the assumption all the blue states turn blue.  Again, the only way you can do that is by looking at another candidate.  Illinois probably isn't going to support a brownback or Allen, but I will bet money that a Guiliani or McCain can win here against a Clark or Warner.  DOn't take location for granted... it is foolish and doesn't guarentee a victory.  
http://www.imvotingrepublican.com/ McCain Sucks!
by yitbos96bb on Fri Nov 04, 2005 at 08:52:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]