Display:


Re: Just correcting "facts" (none / 0)

Yea, $4.6M, but that's not counting from the $10M that he had the DCCC throw at Texas the last week.
by Jerome Armstrong on Tue Jan 25, 2005 at 03:24:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Just correcting "facts" (none / 0)

I think that's a gross exxageration.  But yes, there were DCCC expenditures--I know they ran ads, and they may have had people in the field.

But you insinuate that Frost ran through $7mil in the same way Dean ran through $50mil.  And I don't think that is a fair comparison to make, especially when you have your numbers wrong.

by DemDog on Tue Jan 25, 2005 at 03:39:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Just correcting "facts" (none / 0)

Fine.. Martin Frost spent $7 Million in a congressional district and ran 9.5% ahead of the DPI.

Howard Dean spent $50 million on a presidential primary campaign in order to win one state.

You can criticize Martin Frost's spending policies or failure to "decry the consultant culture", but Dean supporters should be asking Howard Dean the same questions.

by ByronUT on Tue Jan 25, 2005 at 11:31:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Hey, you forgot Leland n/t (none / 0)


Besides telling us how to live, think, marry, pray, vote, invest, educate our children and, die, the GOP has done a fine job of getting gov't out of our lives.
by Parker on Tue Jan 25, 2005 at 05:31:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]