But you insinuate that Frost ran through $7mil in the same way Dean ran through $50mil. And I don't think that is a fair comparison to make, especially when you have your numbers wrong.
Howard Dean spent $50 million on a presidential primary campaign in order to win one state.
You can criticize Martin Frost's spending policies or failure to "decry the consultant culture", but Dean supporters should be asking Howard Dean the same questions.
