Display:


I disagree (none / 0)

you don't help our base with a southerner (who cannot be that liberal) and you are not going to win a national election (as you can't rely on local breadbasket issues - the only way Dems win in the Southern states any more).

What we need is a role up your sleeves regular guy democrat.  We need a Richie Daley, an Ed Rendell or a Dick Durbin.  We need a guy who can appeal to urban voters and working class whites.  I don't think Edwards can really do this (he appeals to rural voters, not urban voters).  

I also think this line of thinking (I agree with Chris) pushes us towards shaping a message designer for southern rural voters rather than northern urban, suburban and exurban voters.  

Outside of a "working class" white democrate, the only other type of candidate I think we should consider is a Hispanic candidate (like Alex Penelas).  No more white southern democrats.

by lojo on Sun Nov 07, 2004 at 09:10:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I disagree (none / 0)

Oh, I disagree strongly that Edwards doesn't appeal to urban voters.    I think the question is does he really have that strong of an appeal to rural voters.

I agree that going Southern candidate-wise is no lock - but it's nothing to be afraid of  (as NE is).    I also agree that a "dull" midwestern type is probably not nearly as dull to the people we'd like to appeal to.    I will never again roll my eyes at a Gephardt-type  (though not Dick himself)

by Andmoreagain on Sun Nov 07, 2004 at 01:55:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]