Beyond Obama

If over the past few months, I've thought about anything it is how the presidential prospects for the Democratic Party post-Obama aren't exactly glimmering with hope. It is pretty evident that in this coming 2012 electoral cycle for progressives in particular and for Democrats generally, there is really no alternative to supporting the President's re-election even if lukewarmly. No doubt, Barack Obama is a huge disappointment to progressives but whom else do we have? 

It gets worse when you start thinking about 2016. Look at the Republicans and you'll find a plethora of possible candidates. There's Rep. Paul Ryan with his Path to Perdition and Senator Marco Rubio of Florida who is beginning to raise his profile positioning himself as the Hispanic reincarnation of Ronald Reagan. Also waiting in the wings is the current object of pachyderm affection, New Jersey's Chris Christie. Minnesota's Tim Pawlenty could conceivably run again, so could Newt Gingrich not mention the loony twins Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann. On the more moderate side, there's even former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman. Even the libertarians can boast Gary Johnson of New Mexico and Rand Paul of Kentucky. But what about the Democrats?

There just aren't that many Democrats with a national profile at the moment or even Democrats in a position to raise their national profile and that should concern us. The New York Times does profile one Democrat today who apparently does harbor national ambitions but if you read the lead in you're not exactly left with a warm glow.

He has clashed with unions, who he believes have helped drive his state into bankruptcy. He has been praised by prominent conservatives like Sarah Palin and Rudolph W. Giuliani. And he has taken thousands of dollars in campaign money from the New York billionaire David H. Koch, who with his family has financed the Tea Party movement.

His name: Andrew M. Cuomo, the governor of New York, a state where Democrats dominate and where his father, Mario M. Cuomo, is still invoked as a paragon of activist government and liberal principle.

In his first months in office, Governor Cuomo is taking a different tack. The man who began public life advocating for homeless people won passage of a budget that makes steep cuts to schools, health care and social services. In a year when Wall Street posted record profits, Mr. Cuomo firmly rejected a politically popular income tax surcharge on the wealthy that was sought by many Democratic lawmakers. And Mr. Cuomo has promised to press for a cap on local property taxes, an idea with its modern roots in the conservative-led California tax revolt of the 1970s.

Mr. Cuomo’s approach to governing has burnished his prospects for higher office — an ambition he neither confirms nor denies — playing against the conventional stereotype of a New York Democrat and drawing praise from the political right (some of it, perhaps, not entirely sincere). Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, a Republican, has called Mr. Cuomo “my soul mate.” The Wall Street Journal’s editorial page has praised Mr. Cuomo’s “ruptures with Democratic orthodoxy.”

But Mr. Cuomo’s choices have also rankled some former allies and stirred suspicions among some fellow Democrats about his motivation.

“Governor Cuomo wants to be president, and he would do anything to be president,” State Senator Rubén Díaz Sr., a Bronx Democrat, said in a speech on the Senate floor as lawmakers debated the budget whose terms were largely dictated by Mr. Cuomo. “He would take away the Medicare from the people,” Mr. Díaz said, “he would take the services from the poor, he would take the money from education.”

We have five years to find an alternative to Andrew Cuomo.

Tags: Democratic Politics, andrew cuomo (all tags)

Comments

6 Comments

Cuomo is out of the running. Okay.

Just read a diary at Booman Tribune today, alerting everyone that Hillary will eventually resign as SoS and renew her campaign for the lost nomination and the presidency. It is a possibility. She has a year at least to use her SoS position to advantage. Perhaps this time around she will leave Bill at home, since there is a tendency, super intelligent or not, for his thinking to disintegrate on the campaign trail when losing (we also remember the days of triangulation when he was in office; all of his regular staff resigned).

In any case, a Hillary campaign would make for a interesting rerun of 2008.

 

by MainStreet 2011-04-06 05:09PM | 0 recs
RE: Cuomo is out of the running. Okay.

Well one has to take Hillary Clinton at her word. She has on more than one occasion said that she is not interested in pursuing elective office.

There are few possibilities such John Hickenlooper of Colorado or perhaps Peter Shumlin of Vermont but these are hardly household names even to most Democrats much less to a wider audience.

by Charles Lemos 2011-04-06 07:54PM | 0 recs
Pat Quinn of Illinois is another very dark horse

The thing is he has no national constituency and a second Illinois president in a row further adds to unlikelihood.

On the plus side he has some progressive credit that is matched with a very strong streak of do what it takes to win, "progressive" or not. He swan against the 2010 tide with a surprise win. He pushed through a tax increase in Illinois that will help balance the budget but not do it all.

So far as I know, no one but no one is suggesting he is a potential presidential candidate. I only bring him up because you mention the lack of a 2016 bench and he's my governor of the moment.

 

by Jeff Wegerson 2011-04-06 10:58PM | 0 recs
OT - Colombia Transit in the News at Boing Boing

http://www.boingboing.net/2011/04/06/cwa-three-things-i-l.html

I appreciate that you turned me on to bus rapid transit Colombia style, quite a while back.

 

by Jeff Wegerson 2011-04-06 11:00PM | 0 recs
What about Elizabeth Warren?

Wouldn't she be the ideal progressive candidate?  She's got nothing but pro-human anti-corportate background.  There's hardly anyone who could say she doesn't understand how the Washington or Wall Street games work.  She's still an outsider because she's never held elected office.  The banks HATE her.  She's extremely intellegent.  She has a pretty decent camera presence.

We'd just need a good running mate, one that has really strong progressive foreign affairs cred.  Wesley Clark?  Someone with the military might help those closed minded enough to think she might not be able to stand up to China or whoever the boogey-man du jur happens to be.

by jlars 2011-04-07 11:49AM | 0 recs
RE: What about Elizabeth Warren?

She would be great but highly unlikely. Obama is planning on raising $1 billion dollars for his 2012 re-election campaign. Who knows what 2016 will require but it certainly won't be less. It is also tough for non-politicians to make their first run for elective office the Presidency. If Warren were to run for Governor in Massachusetts or Senator first, I think then you can make the case that she use that springboard for a run at the White House.

Wesley Clark, on the other hand, is an interesting idea.

by Charles Lemos 2011-04-07 12:49PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads