New Polls: Senate Races in KY, PA, FL, LA, & MO and Generic Ballot

All sorts of new polls out this week; it’s a junkie’s dream. Good news for Democrats on the generic ballot and presidential approval, and in Senate races, decent news in Kentucky and Pennsylvania, bad but expected news in Florida and Louisiana, and just plain bad news in Missouri.

In Kentucky, a new PPP poll shows Lt. Gov. Dan Mongiardo leading AG Jack Conway in the Democratic primary for Senate, 36-27. I’m not sure what to make of this poll – the last public poll, from SurveyUSA, had Mongiardo up just 3, and that was before a number of corruption scandals became public. Conway internals had him leading after the scandals broke. I’m going to continue to assume that this race is a toss-up. Also in Kentucky, PPP finds Rand Paul leading Trey Grayson 46-28 in the Senate GOP primary, a much more expected result, and Mike Huckabee and Sarah Palin tied at 24 in a way-too-early presidential primary poll.

Still in KY-SEN, Rasmussen finds that Conway is competitive in a general election while Mongiardo is not. You might find that odd, given that Conway is the progressive and this is Kentucky, but hey, ethics are ethics. Anyway, Rasmussen shows Conway with a 47-36 approval spread, as compared to Mongiardo’s 40-48. In the four hypothetical general election head-to-heads, no Repub candidate ever cracks 50%, and Conway always outpolls Mongiardo, trailing Grayson by 5 and Paul by 9 as compared to Mongiardo’s 14 and 16. Pretty compelling numbers, if electability is what you look for in a primary.

Leaving the south, in PA-SEN, two new polls show Admiral and decorated veteran Joe Sestak catching up with Swift Boating incumbent Arlen Specter, but he still has a long way to go. A new poll from Muhlenberg, their first with 402 LV Democrats and a 5% MOE, shows Sestak within the MOE at 46-42. Quinnipiac shows a much wider gap, with Specter leading 47-39, but Quinnipiac’s previous poll from a month earlier had it at 53-32. The takeaway is that Specter is still easily the favorite but that Sestak now has a real chance. At Pollster.com, Harry Enten analyzes different types of polls and their history in recent cycles, concluding that “this election is probably going to be a close one, and Specter better hope for a healthy turnout.”

Conway’s general and Sestak’s improving numbers are about the only good news out there for progressives. The first FL-SEN poll, from Rasmussen, to come out since Crist’s party switch is the worst news yet for Democrat Kendrick Meek: Crist 38, Rubio 34, Meek 17. The poll shows Rasmussen’s desire for money and speed – it’s N=500 in a one-day frame – but it nonetheless underlines what I’ve been saying for days. Crist’s move hurts Meek more than Rubio. Meek’s previous three-way low, also from Rasmussen, was 22, and his previous non-Rasmussen low was 24.

More bad news in both MO-SEN and LA-SEN. In Missouri, allegedly a toss-up and one of our best shots, Rasmussen has Repub Roy Blount leading Democrat Robin Carnahan 50-42. The good news is that it’s the right-leaning, automated phone response Rasmussen. Still, a trend is a trend, and Rasmussen’s previous two polls showed this race at 48-42 and 47-41. RCP gives him a lead of just one point, but that includes a September poll so it’s complete bunk. So far no good in Missouri. Louisiana isn’t much better, either. No, this race was never considered a toss-up, but with a horny felon running against a Blue Dog, you’d think we’d at least have a chance. And yet, admittedly Republican pollster Lane Grigsby of Opinion Research shows David “I like my prostitutes in diapers” Vitter leading Rep. Charlie Melancon 49-31. Vitter has a favorable/unfavorable of 55036, lower than Gov. Jindal (R)’s but higher than senator Landrieu or President Obama’s. The RCP average is Vitter by 15.3, which would actually be higher if they didn’t include numbers from last July.

But let’s end on a bright spot. In the Gallup generic ballot, Democrats are holding steady in a tie at 45-45. On the one hand, Democrats are in their worst generic ballot position ever, but on the other hand, this is the second week in a row Gallup has found a 45-45 tie, and it follows Democratic leads from YouGov/Polimetrix and ABC/Washington Post. Only the right-leaning Rasmussen finds a Repub lead.

The new CBS/New York Times poll also gives good news for Democrats. The President clocks in at a 51-39 approval rating. In previous monthly CBS polls, he was at 50-40, 49-41, and 46-45. Quibble with the numbers, but a trend is a trend. Maybe he’s above 50, maybe not, but President Obama and even Congressional Democrats have only improved their position over the past few months. CBS/NYT finds similar trends on specific issues, even those where the net remains negative.

Tags: KY-Sen, PA-Sen, FL-Sen, LA-Sen, MO-Sen, 2010 midterms, polls (all tags)

Comments

10 Comments

RE: New Polls: Senate Races in KY, PA, FL, LA, & MO and Generic Ballot

This post has the worst permalink ever...

by Nathan Empsall 2010-05-04 07:39PM | 0 recs
RE: New Polls: Senate Races in KY, PA, FL, LA, & MO and Generic Ballot

Must be mostly good news. No Upstate Kent---yet.

by spirowasright 2010-05-04 08:50PM | 0 recs
I hate to say this

but if I were in Florida, I'd vote for Crist. Anything to keep Rubio out of the Senate.

Something funky going on with the permalinks, I got one earlier that was just 3 letters . . .grr

by Charles Lemos 2010-05-04 10:42PM | 0 recs
RE: I hate to say this

Meek should have run for reelection and see if there's an open seat (could Bill Nelson retire?) available in 2012.

by esconded 2010-05-04 11:01PM | 0 recs
RE: I hate to say this

I know many lifelong liberals expressing the same sentiment down there.

Their sense is that Meeks is weak and unelectable, at least now. Crist is the moderate Republican they know, and when faced with a choice between the RINO they know and they teabagger they fear, they will vote Crist.

My question is: how will the GOP respond if Crist wins?

by NoFortunateSon 2010-05-04 11:47PM | 0 recs
KY-Sen

Looking at the PPP internals, one of Conway's difficulties could be support among conservative Democrats, as Kentucky is one state where their numbers are substantial.  But I find it hard to believe that Conway is less well known at this stage and has similar favorables to Mongiardo despite the latter's ethical problems.

Why do Democrats go for the least electable candidate?

BTW, in Ohio, Fisher's primary win was by a smaller than expected margin, which could make party unity that more difficult.

by esconded 2010-05-04 11:00PM | 0 recs
Be careful

The new CBS/New York Times poll also gives good news for Democrats. The President clocks in at a 51-39 approval rating. In previous monthly CBS polls, he was at 50-40, 49-41, and 46-45. Quibble with the numbers, but a trend is a trend. Maybe he’s above 50, maybe not, but President Obama and even Congressional Democrats have only improved their position over the past few months. CBS/NYT finds similar trends on specific issues, even those where the net remains negative.

As we knew all along, Obama's approval was suppressed in part by economic conditions. Nate Silver notes optimism in the White House is rising as well, presumably bouyed by warming internal numbers. The New York Times notes the all important perception that the economy is improving. There is such a strong historical precedent for economic hardship depressing the approval of a fundamentally popular Presdient, most notably with Ronald Regan.

All this is very interesting, for should the trend continue, losses will be insufficient to effect a change in House Leadership.

* * *

On a lighter note, news such as this is bound to drive the Obama Derangement Crowd on the left (even more) stark raving mad, which provides me with unending glee. I've noticed an uptake in their hysteria. Their only solace was Obama's depressed national poll numbers (at about a 50/50 split). Take that away...

When news broke of the failed Times Square bombing attempt, those on the right suspected Islamic terrorists, those on the left suspected right wing radicals, and I suspected PUMAs.

by NoFortunateSon 2010-05-05 12:09AM | 0 recs
RE: Be careful

First of all, that post wasn't by Nate Silver. It was by Tom Schaller or whatever his name was.

Second, congrats on patting yourself ont he back for sticking by your man/party, right or wrong. it must be nice to put your team identification over wanting to put pressure on politicians to do the right thing more often. I wish I had your lack of conviction - it must be an easier life.

by jeopardy 2010-05-05 03:09PM | 0 recs
Here's a tissue for your tears.

It's really got to be tough for you if perception of Obama is improving.

by NoFortunateSon 2010-05-05 09:32PM | 0 recs
RE: Here's a tissue for your tears.

That's not tough for me. I stayed in hotel rooms for weeks in a neighboring swing state to help out with his election.

What's tough for me is that he isn't living up to his potential in a number of areas, and I'm dismayed by people like you who will adopt any position simply because Obama does. It's pathetic, and if nobody on the left ever stood up for anything, policy would continue to move to the right.

by jeopardy 2010-05-06 08:38PM | 0 recs

Diaries

Advertise Blogads